Matter of Gammerman v. Bd. of Elections of the City of New York
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Fuentes v. Catalano (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- Settineri v. DiCarlo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Marchiselli v. Black (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- Leff v. Board of Elections (N.Y. 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that the defect of late filing is not curable for the reasons assigned.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Judge Fuchsberg dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: The drastic result in this case is the consequence of the harsh rule this court enunciated in such cases as Matter of Rutter v Coveney (38 NY2d 993) and Matter of Higby v Mahoney (48 NY2d 15). Reiterating the views I expressed in those cases, I would find an exception for the extraordinary circumstances which confront us now and reverse.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.