People v. Hunter
Cases that cite this one
23 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Lerhinan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
- People v. Braham (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Braham (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Cook (New York Supreme Court 1996)
- People v. Edmonds (New York County Courts 1993)
- In re Stephen R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- People v. Morrel (Criminal Court of the City of New York 1991)
- People v. Lumpkins (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Dunkley (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Thomas (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Wesley (N.Y. 1989)
- People v. Dowdell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- People v. Cullen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- People v. Wade (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- People v. Santiago (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- People v. Millan (N.Y. 1987)
- People v. Heizman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Williams (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Catalano (New York Supreme Court 1987)
- People v. Hunt (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Millan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Bell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Robinson (New York County Courts 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed. Defendant lacks standing to challenge the seizure of the weapon, as the doctrine of “automatic standing” is unavailable (People v Ponder, 54 NY2d 160) and defendant is unable to demonstrate a reasonable expectation of privacy in the area searched (see Rakas v Illinois, 439 US 128).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.