People v. Johnson
Cases that cite this one
24 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Hayes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Carrier (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- People v. Obieke (New York Supreme Court 2000)
- People v. Navarro (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- People v. Glover (N.Y. 1995)
- People v. Hart (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- People v. Lee (New York Supreme Court 1992)
- People v. Pannetta (New York County Courts 1991)
- People v. Thompson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Diaz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Cody (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Stern (New York Supreme Court 1990)
- People v. Lubanski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- People v. Knapp (New York County Courts 1988)
- People v. Hicks (N.Y. 1987)
- People v. Feneque (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Sanchez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Fox (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Hartley (N.Y. 1985)
- People v. Congden (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Short (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Pelkey (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- People v. Rowell (N.Y. 1983)
- People v. Johnson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Justice John J. Callahan at the Appellate Division (79 AD2d 203, 204) and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for consideration of the facts (CPL 470.25, subd 2, par [d]; 470.40, subd 2, par [b]), this court having determined that the reversal by the Appellate Division was “upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal” with respect to the issues reviewed (CPL 450.90, subd 2, par [a]).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.