Premo v. Cornell

New York Court of Appeals
Premo v. Cornell, 55 N.Y.2d 962 (N.Y. 1982)
449 N.Y.S.2d 195; 434 N.E.2d 264; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3145

Premo v. Cornell

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rule of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the action pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]). Indeed, as we held in Barasch v Micucci (49 NY2d 594, 600-601), it would have been an abuse of discretion to have failed to dismiss.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Reference

Full Case Name
Chloe Premo v. Donald Cornell
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published