Ross v. Ross

New York Court of Appeals
Ross v. Ross, 55 N.Y.2d 999 (N.Y. 1982)
449 N.Y.S.2d 481; 434 N.E.2d 717; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3173

Ross v. Ross

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]): Plaintiff’s cross appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the cross appeal pursuant to CPLR 5601 (subd [d]) does not lie because the cross appellant is not a party aggrieved by the prior nonfinal order of the Appellate Division (CPLR 5511). Defendants’ appeal pursuant to CPLR 5601 (subd [a], par [ii]) dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution and a separate appeal does not lie (see Matter of Aho [Rhodes], 39 NY2d 241, 248). On defendants’ appeal, pursuant to CPLR 5601 (subd [d]), from the judgment of separation entered in Supreme Court, Queens County, judgment affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division.

*1002Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Reference

Full Case Name
Tamar Ross v. Howard Ross, Appellants-Respondents
Cited By
17 cases
Status
Published