People v. David L.
Cases that cite this one
59 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- People v. Vasquez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- People v. Robinson (N.Y. 2001)
- People v. Gonzalez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Millan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Livigni (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1982)
- People v. Judge (New York Supreme Court 1982)
- MUESES, ROGELIO, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Mueses (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Mueses (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. Funderbunk (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Carter (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- In re William S. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- People v. Prado (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2004)
- People v. Webb (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- People v. Gonzalez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- People v. Martinez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- People v. Tyler (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- People v. Abad (New York Supreme Court 1997)
- People v. Damaceno (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Garcia (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Edwards (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Guzman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Vaneiken (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Manganaro (New York Supreme Court 1990)
- People v. Marquez (New York Supreme Court 1990)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by former Justice James D. Hopkins and Justice Moses M. Weinstein at the Appellate Division (81 AD2d 893, 895-896) and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for consideration of the facts (CPL 470.25, subd 2, par [d]; 470.40, subd 2, par [b]).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli and Jones. Judges Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer dissent and vote to affirm for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (81 AD2d 893).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.