New York Court of Appeals, 1982

Nieves v. Holmes Protection, Inc.

Nieves v. Holmes Protection, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 15, 1982
56 N.Y.2d 914; 438 N.E.2d 1145; 453 N.Y.S.2d 430; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3508
Nieves v. Holmes Protection, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*916OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. We agree that plaintiff was not a third-party beneficiary of the agreement between C.G.M. Check Cashing Corporation and Holmes Protection, Inc., for provision of a burglar alarm system. Nor can it be said as a matter of law that negligence, if any, on defendant’s part was the proximate cause of the injuries suffered.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.