Rye Town/King Civic Ass'n v. Town of Rye

New York Court of Appeals
Rye Town/King Civic Ass'n v. Town of Rye, 56 N.Y.2d 985 (N.Y. 1982)
453 N.Y.S.2d 682; 439 N.E.2d 397; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3534

Rye Town/King Civic Ass'n v. Town of Rye

Opinion of the Court

opinion of the court

Memorandum.

The motion for leave to appeal should be dismissed as untimely.

A party who has mistaken the method for obtaining appellate review is entitled to a 30-day extension of time within which to pursue the proper method of appeal (CPLR 5514, subd [a]). In such circumstances, however, an adverse party who initially did not either appeal as of right under CPLR 5513 (subd [a]), or move for leave to appeal under CPLR 5513 (subd [b]), or cross-appeal or cross-move for leave to appeal under CPLR 5513 (subd [c]), may not avail itself of the 10-day extension provided by CPLR 5513 (subd [c]).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed in a memorandum, with twenty dollars costs and necessary reproduction disbursements to intervenor-respondent.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of Rye Town/King Civic Association v. Town of Rye, Atrium Associates, Intervenor-Respondent
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published