People v. Cadorette
Cases that cite this one
30 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Ramos v. Walker (District Court, E.D. New York 1990)
- CONGELOSI v. Miller (District Court, W.D. New York 2009)
- Wyatt v. State (Tenn. 2000)
- Lugo v. Kuhlmann (District Court, S.D. New York 1999)
- Avincola v. Stinson (District Court, S.D. New York 1999)
- People v. Ward (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Ward (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Davis (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- People v. O'HARA (N.Y. 2001)
- People v. Toribio (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- People v. Dejesus (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- People v. Jones (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- People v. Watson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- People v. Tucker (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- People v. Lassiter (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- People v. Brooks (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- People v. Reid (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- People v. Reyes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Freeman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. McKenzie (N.Y. 1986)
- People v. Martinez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- People v. Harris (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Scott (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Frazer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- People v. Richardson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Our review of the record reveals that the evidence presented at trial is sufficient to support defendant’s conviction for attempted murder. Defendant’s other contention regarding alleged errors in the trial court’s charge to the jury has not been preserved for our review insofar as no exception to the charge was taken at trial (People v Thomas, 50 NY2d 467).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.