Leff v. Board of Elections

New York Court of Appeals
Leff v. Board of Elections, 57 N.Y.2d 890 (N.Y. 1982)
456 N.Y.S.2d 49; 442 N.E.2d 447; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3767

Leff v. Board of Elections

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, without costs (see Matter of Gammerman v Board of Elections of City of N. Y., 57 NY2d 888, decided herewith).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Judge Fuchsberg dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: The drastic result in this case is the consequence of the harsh rule this court enunciated in such cases as Matter of Rutter v Coveney (38 NY2d 993) and Matter of Higby v Mahoney (48 NY2d 15). Reiterating the views I expressed in those cases, I would find an exception for the extraordinary circumstances which confront us now and reverse.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of James J. Leff v. Board of Elections of the City of New York, Shirley Levittan, Proposed Intervenors-Respondents
Status
Published