Gould v. Kerwick

New York Court of Appeals
Gould v. Kerwick, 57 N.Y.2d 1012 (N.Y. 1982)
457 N.Y.S.2d 474; 443 N.E.2d 948; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3853

Gould v. Kerwick

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), *1016order reversed, with costs, and the judgment and order of Supreme Court, Ulster County, reinstated for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division (87 AD2d 917, 919-920). Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of Kingdon Gould, Jr. v. Robert A. Kerwick, as Assessor of the Town of Hardenburgh
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published