New York Court of Appeals, 1982

Fazio v. Joy

Fazio v. Joy
New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 18, 1982
58 N.Y.2d 674; 458 N.Y.S.2d 526; 444 N.E.2d 990; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3904

Fazio v. Joy

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (89 AD2d 604). We emphasize that the proper standard of review of determinations by the Commissioner of Department of Housing Preservation and Development is a “rational basis” test (Matter of Asen Bros. & Brook v Leventhal, 54 NY2d 839; Matter of Colton v Berman, 21 NY2d 322, 329).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.