New York Court of Appeals, 1983

Matter of Geary v. Comm'r of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York

Matter of Geary v. Comm'r of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 30, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 950; 453 N.E.2d 533; 466 N.Y.S.2d 304; 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3253
Matter of Geary v. Comm'r of Motor Vehicles of the State of New York

Cases that cite this one

30 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), *952 order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice John J. Callahan at the Appellate Division (92 AD2d 38). We note, however, that no inference should be drawn that, had substantial prejudice resulted to petitioner from respondent’s delay in scheduling the hearing, respondent would have been ousted of jurisdiction to revoke. In such circumstance, there would have been “at most an ‘erroneous exercise of authority’ since such delay would not divest the [commissioner] of jurisdiction.” (Matter of Sarkisian Bros. v State Div. of Human Rights, 48 NY2d 816, 818.)

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.