MATTER OF TOWN OF YORKTOWN v. New York State Dep't of Mental Hygiene
MATTER OF TOWN OF YORKTOWN v. New York State Dep't of Mental Hygiene
59 N.Y.2d 999; 466 N.Y.S.2d 965; 453 N.E.2d 1254; 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3275
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Plaza v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Town of Coeymans v. City of Albany (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- Young v. Board of Trustees of the Village of Blasdell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- Community Planning Board. No. 4 (Manhattan) v. Homes for the Homeless (New York Supreme Court 1993)
- Whibco, Inc. v. Village of Round Lake (New York Supreme Court 1991)
- Haggerty v. Planning Board of the Town of Sand Lake (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- Friends of Woodstock, Inc. v. Town of Woodstock Planning Board (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Wing v. Coyne (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Vanderwoude v. Post/Rockland Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Dreves v. New York Power Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Citizens for Environmental Safety v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Save Pine Bush, Inc. v. City of Albany (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- Main Seneca Corp. v. Erie County Industrial Development Agency (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
- Manes v. Simpson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- Southampton Ass'n v. Planning Board (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1985)
- Antonecchia v. Williams (New York Supreme Court 1984)
- Schweiss v. Ambach (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (92 AD2d 897; see Matter of Harlem Val. United Coalition v Hall, 54 NY2d 977).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.