In re Kim W.
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Stancil v. Brock (N.C. Ct. App. 1993)
- In re the Foster Care Status of Shakiba P. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- In re H. — M. Children (NYC Family Court 1992)
- Alpha S. v. Krauskopf (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1984)
- In re the Foster Care Status of Lucinda G. (New York Family Court 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Justice Arthur Markewich in his dissent at the Appellate Division. In addition we note that the question as to whether periodic court review presently required for children placed in foster homes (Social Services Law, § 392) should be extended to children placed for adoption, is the subject of recent study by at least one legislative commission (see Proposal for Voluntary Foster Care Placement and Review Proceedings in Family Court, by the New York State Temp Comm to Recodify the Family Ct Act, pp 17-18 [1982]).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.
Order reversed, without costs, petitions dismissed and question certified answered in the negative in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.