New York Court of Appeals, 1983

In re the Arbitration between Waks & Waugh

New York Court of Appeals · Decided May 5, 1983

59 N.Y.2d 723; 463 N.Y.S.2d 425; 450 N.E.2d 231; 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3085

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

159 MP Corp. v. Redbridge Bedford, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons, with respect to the issues raised, stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 575). Arbitration of the dispute does not offend public policy because it arises from the *726settlement agreement executed by the parties rather than from the underlying dispute.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.