Appel v. Charles Heinsohn, Inc.
Appel v. Charles Heinsohn, Inc.
59 N.Y.2d 741; 450 N.E.2d 247; 463 N.Y.S.2d 441; 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3094
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision.
- Forrest v. Gilley (Ind. Ct. App. 1991)
- MacHo v. Mahowald (Minn. Ct. App. 1985)
- Shaw v. Burgess (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Roupp v. Conrad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Carter v. Metro North Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- Wilson v. Whiteman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- White v. Bruner (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- Whitt v. Mason (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Bohm v. Nystrum Construction (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Wardrop v. Koerner (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Papadopoulos v. Gardner's Village, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Tessiero v. Conrad (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Timpanaro v. Topping Riding School, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Maurice Kunstenaar v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co., Texas Eastern Transmission Corp., and Halcon S.D. Group, Inc. (2d Cir. 1990)
- Hoffert v. Commercial Ins. Co. of Newark, NJ (District Court, S.D. New York 1990)
- Zboray v. Fessler (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Lynch v. Nacewicz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Bozick v. Chocianowski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Brophy v. Columbia County Agricultural Society (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (91 AD2d 1029).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.