Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.
Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.
59 N.Y.2d 919; 453 N.E.2d 522; 466 N.Y.S.2d 293; 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3241
Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Reid S. Moule (90 AD2d 332). Additionally we observe that there is no evidentiary support in the record for any finding that the scrap metals/raw materials market (as distinguished from the shredded scrap/products market) was limited to the Rochester area to which the agreement of the parties related.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer concur; Judge Simons taking no part.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.