Hoan Holding Co. v. Joy
New York Court of Appeals
Hoan Holding Co. v. Joy, 59 N.Y.2d 1012 (N.Y. 1983)
453 N.E.2d 1245; 466 N.Y.S.2d 956; 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3281
Hoan Holding Co. v. Joy
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. On this record, it cannot be said that the commissioner’s determination that the landlord had failed to prove continuous owner occupancy for a period of one year (Administrative Code of City of New York, § Y51-3.0, subd e, par 2, cl [i], subcl [3]; New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations, § 2, subd f, par [11]) lacks a rational basis.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In the Matter of Hoan Holding Co. v. Daniel W. Joy, as Commissioner of the Department of Housing Preservation and Development, and Homer Price, Intervenor-Respondent
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published