New York Court of Appeals, 1983

Hoan Holding Co. v. Joy

Hoan Holding Co. v. Joy
New York Court of Appeals · Decided July 7, 1983
59 N.Y.2d 1012; 453 N.E.2d 1245; 466 N.Y.S.2d 956; 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3281

Hoan Holding Co. v. Joy

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs. On this record, it cannot be said that the commissioner’s determination that the landlord had failed to prove continuous owner occupancy for a period of one year (Administrative Code of City of New York, § Y51-3.0, subd e, par 2, cl [i], subcl [3]; New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations, § 2, subd f, par [11]) lacks a rational basis.

*1014Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.