Ferguson v. McNab
Cases that cite this one
24 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. O'HARA (N.Y. 2001)
- Matter of Glickman v. Laffin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Stewart v. Chautauqua County Board of Elections (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Willkie v. Delaware County Board of Elections (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Wit v. Berman (2d Cir. 2002)
- Wit v. Berman (2d Cir. 2002)
- Williams v. Rensselaer County Board of Elections (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1983)
- Davis v. Clennon (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2024)
- Matter of McArdle v. Weiss (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of McArdle v. Weiss (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- The Matter of Steven Glickman v. Zackary Laffin (N.Y. 2016)
- Glickman v. Laffin (New York Supreme Court 2016)
- Matter of Maas v. Gaebel (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Stewart v. Chautauqua County Board of Elections (N.Y. 2010)
- Holt v. Ward (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Eisenberg v. Strasser (New York Supreme Court 2003)
- Aran v. Mejias (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- MATTER OF HOSLEY v. Curry (N.Y. 1995)
- Hosley v. Curry (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- Isabella v. Hotaling (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Anderson v. Moore (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Geller v. Lasher (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Iaboni v. Sunderland (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Umland v. Board of Elections (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Respondent candidate having two residences may choose one to which she has legitimate, significant and continuing attachments as her residence for purposes of the Election Law. (Matter of Gallagher v Dinkins, 32 NY2d 839; Election Law, § 1-104, subd 22.) We find that the determination of the Appellate Division more nearly comports with the evidence that respondent Lorraine A. Santoianni has chosen her Huntington address.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.
Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.