New York Court of Appeals, 1983

Canter v. Mulnick

Canter v. Mulnick
New York Court of Appeals · Decided September 29, 1983
60 N.Y.2d 689; 455 N.E.2d 1257; 468 N.Y.S.2d 462; 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3391
Canter v. Mulnick

Cases that cite this one

44 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.

The Appellate Division correctly held that the plaintiffs’ affidavit failed to establish the merit of their case, and that the motion to dismiss should have been granted unconditionally (see Stolowitz u Mount Sinai Hosp., 60 NY2d 685).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.