Melahn v. Hearn
Cases that cite this one
39 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- First National Bank v. Atkin (New York Supreme Court 2000)
- Matter of Jacob (N.Y. 1995)
- Salamanca Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Darrow (New York County Courts 1994)
- County Acquisitions, LLC v. Lanser (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Terrilee 97th Street LLC v. New York City Environmental Control Board (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Clement v. Durban (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Joel Friedberg Trustee v. Metaglo, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- MORRIS, JOSHUA v. TOWN OF LOCKE (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Morris v. Town of Locke (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Morris v. Town of Locke (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- GUCK, JASON R. v. PRINZING, MALINDA A. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Guck v. Prinzing (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Guck v. Prinzing (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Mittelmark v. County of Saratoga (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Village of Muttontown v. Port Washington Holding Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- State v. Campany (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Gonzalez v. Ovalles-Taveras (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Bauer v. New York State Office of Children & Family Services (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Minotti v. Larkin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Scarangella v. Laborde (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- State v. Moore (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- First National Bank v. Atkin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Nestler v. Dream Acres, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Stephens v. Stephens (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- Onbank & Trust Co. v. Hannold (New York Supreme Court 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a mortgage executed by defendant in favor of plaintiff’s assignor and upon premises formerly owned by defendant. The mortgage secured a debt evidenced by a bond executed at the same time. Defendant’s answer alleged that he was not a proper party because the property had been sold at public auction for unpaid taxes. He subsequently moved for summary judgment on that ground and it appeared from the motion papers that the property had been sold but had been reacquired by defendant at the tax sale. He in turn conveyed the property to another before this action commenced but after plaintiff had filed a lis pendens.
On appeal to this court plaintiff claims the sale must be vacated alleging that his mortgage and assignment were recorded and that he has been deprived of due process because of the failure to give him actual notice of the tax sale and of his right to redeem (see Mennonite Bd. of Missions v Adams, 462 US_, 103 S Ct 2706; Congregation Yetev Lev D’Satmar v County of Sullivan, 59 NY2d 418). Since that constitutional issue was not raised below, it is not preserved for our review (Matter of Eagle v Paterson, 57 NY2d 831, 833; Barber v Dembroski, 54 NY2d 648, 650; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], § 169).
Insofar as the merits of the action are concerned, we agree with the majority opinion of Justice Mangano at the Appellate Division (92 AD2d 319) that when the mortgagee failed to redeem the property within the three-year
Our disposition of the appeal is without prejudice to plaintiff repleading so much of the cause of action as seeks foreclosure and a deficiency judgment to allege a claim to recover on the bond.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.