New York Court of Appeals, 1984

Bee Jay Industrial Corp. v. Fina

Bee Jay Industrial Corp. v. Fina
New York Court of Appeals · Decided June 7, 1984 · Cooke, Jasen, Jones, Kaye, Meyer, Simons, Wachtler
62 N.Y.2d 851; 466 N.E.2d 164; 477 N.Y.S.2d 624; 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4396

Bee Jay Industrial Corp. v. Fina

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (98 AD2d 738). We note that defendants’ motion for summary judgment was itself predicated on the absence of a written contract as required by the Statute of Frauds (General Obligations Law, § 5-703, subd 2).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.