New York Court of Appeals, 1984

Neuwirth v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield

Neuwirth v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
New York Court of Appeals · Decided May 3, 1984 · Cooke, Jasen, Jones, Kaye, Ler, Meyer, Simons, Wacht
62 N.Y.2d 718; 465 N.E.2d 353; 476 N.Y.S.2d 814; 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4322

Neuwirth v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and, on defendants’ stipulation, judgment granted in favor of plaintiff.

The burden of proving that a claim falls within the exclusions of an insurance policy rests with the insurer (see International Paper Co. v Continental Cas. Co., 35 NY2d 322, 327; Prashker v United States Guar. Co., 1 NY2d 584, 594). Accordingly, the trial court properly ordered a new trial after it recognized that it had erroneously charged the jury that the insured’s representative had the burden of proof as to the application of the exclusions.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wacht-ler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, etc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.