Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
New York Court of Appeals, 1984

Erwin Pearl, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.

Erwin Pearl, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.
New York Court of Appeals · Decided July 2, 1984 · Cooke, Jasen, Jones, Kaye, Meyer, Simons, Wachtler
62 N.Y.2d 1031; 468 N.E.2d 700; 479 N.Y.S.2d 518; 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4496

Erwin Pearl, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (98 AD2d 619). We would add only that plaintiff’s affidavit on its motion to reargue failed to establish the merit of its case (see Canter v Mulnick, 60 NY2d 689).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑