New York Court of Appeals, 1984

Fleishman v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Fleishman v. Eli Lilly & Co.
New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 15, 1984
63 N.Y.2d 1017; 473 N.E.2d 764; 484 N.Y.S.2d 536; 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4763

Fleishman v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: whether plaintiff was deprived of due process and equal protection of the laws by the holding that plaintiff’s causes of action accrued and the Statute of Limitations commenced to run upon exposure to the harmful drug. (See 62 NY2d 888.)

Judges Meyer and Kaye taking no part.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.