Shoreham-Wading River Central School District v. Town of Brookhaven
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- Presbyterian Hospital v. Maryland Casualty Co. (N.Y. 1997)
- Priesman v. Meridian Mutual Insurance (Mich. 1992)
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Fogel (District Court, E.D. New York 1999)
- Nyack Hospital v. Government Employees Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- Westchester Medical Center v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Westchester Medical Center v. Progressive Casualty Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- City of New York v. State (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Rodriguez v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- North v. Travelers Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. New York Paving, Inc. (Criminal Court of the City of New York 1992)
- Gross v. Allstate Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- LaDuke v. State Farm Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- Bennett v. State Farm Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Rodriguez v. Joseph (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Gross v. Allstate Insurance (New York Supreme Court 1989)
- Knadle v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Huntington (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Motion to dismiss cross appeal taken by respondents-appellants Acampora et al. in Matter of Rech v Acampora granted and cross appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
On the court’s own motion, appeals in both actions dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceedings within the meaning of the Constitution.
Judge Titone taking no part.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.