People v. Pedraza
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Sharpe (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Sharpe (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Bussey (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- People v. Jones (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- People v. Lampkin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- People v. Garrasi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- People v. Ruger (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- People v. Peters (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- People v. Morin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- People v. Charron (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- People v. Torres (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- People v. Bonner (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- People v. Wilson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Marti (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Tweedy (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Forgione (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- People v. Goetz (New York Supreme Court 1987)
- People v. Bova (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. It is clear from this record that the sentencing court did consider "the nature and circumstances of the crime and * * * the history and character of the defendant” (Penal Law § 70.02 [2] [c] [i]), correctly including whether, in view of defendant’s physical condition, a sentence of imprisonment would be "unduly harsh”. Thus, it cannot be said that the court failed to exercise its discretion or abused that discretion as a matter of law.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.