New York Court of Appeals, 1985

Sutherland v. City of New York

Sutherland v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals · Decided November 12, 1985
66 N.Y.2d 800; 488 N.E.2d 837; 497 N.Y.S.2d 906; 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17932
Sutherland v. City of New York

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered *802 in the affirmative. We interpret the question certified as asking whether the Appellate Division had the power to reinstate the natural parent as guardian ad litem. We conclude that it had that power, and pass on no other issue (Herrick v Second Cuthouse, 64 NY2d 692; Brady v Ottaway Newspapers, 63 NY2d 1031).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judges Meyer and Simons.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.