Matter of Ulysses
Matter of Ulysses
66 N.Y.2d 773; 497 N.Y.S.2d 368; 488 N.E.2d 114; 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17914
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Amor S. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- In re Lindsey B. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- In re Gabrielle HH. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- In re Children (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- In re June D. S. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- In re Alexa Ray R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Bambi C. v. Michial F. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- In re Maurice Jamel G. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- In re Crystal C. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- In re Mitchell Kirkland P. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- In re Orange County Department of Social Services (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Commissioner of Social Services ex rel. L. Children v. Diane R. (NYC Family Court 1994)
- Wetzler v. Federal Deposit Insurance (District Court, S.D. New York 1993)
- In re Siami D. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- In re Anthony M. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- In re St. Christopher-Ottilie (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- In re Christine F. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- In re Lynn W. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- In re I. R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- In re Charles R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- In re Trudell J. W. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order of the Appellate Division appealed from, pursuant to CPLR 5601 (d), and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (87 AD2d 998; see also, CPLR 5501 [b]).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Simons.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.