Sam & Mary Housing Corp. v. Jo/Sal Market Corp.
Sam & Mary Housing Corp. v. Jo/Sal Market Corp.
64 N.Y.2d 1107; 490 N.Y.S.2d 185; 479 N.E.2d 821; 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 15722
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- H & P RESEARCH, INC. v. Liza Realty Corp. (District Court, S.D. New York 1996)
- Caffrey v. North Arrow Abstract & Settlement Servs., Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- Lane v. Lane (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- North Main Street Bagel Corp. v. Duncan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Ga Young Lee v. Charl-Ho Park (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Chateau Rive Corp. v. Enclave Development Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Allen v. Strough (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
- Mayes v. UVI Holdings, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Golonka v. Plaza at Latham, L. L. C. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- Silberman v. Antar (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- Marotta v. Village of Keeseville (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Mehta v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- Lyke v. Anderson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Collom v. Incorporated Village of Freeport, NY (District Court, E.D. New York 1988)
- Bianchi v. Hood (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Long Island Airports Limousine Service Corp. v. Northwest Airlines (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (100 AD2d 901).
*1109 Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.