Foitl v. G.A.F. Corp.
Foitl v. G.A.F. Corp.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Plaintiff does not argue before us that on the papers before the courts below summary judgment was improperly granted. Rather he contends that Special Term abused its discretion as a matter of law by refusing to consider an affidavit of plaintiff which was delivered to the Judge’s law secretary on the same day as, but several hours after, the motion was marked “submitted” on call of the calendar, because, it is argued, it had been inadvertently omitted from plaintiff’s papers. Defendant’s office did not receive a copy of the affidavit until the following day and, as plaintiff concedes, promptly objected to its being considered, while asking that, if the court decided to consider it, defendant be given the opportunity to reply.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Thomas V. Foitl v. G.A.F. Corporation
- Cited By
- 19 cases
- Status
- Published