Corcoran Group, Inc. v. Morris
Corcoran Group, Inc. v. Morris
64 N.Y.2d 1034; 478 N.E.2d 207; 489 N.Y.S.2d 66; 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 16947
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Jacob Gold Realty, Inc. v. Sckoczylas (Civil Court of the City of New York 1998)
- Bloom v. Helmsley Spear, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
- Mizrahi v. Hovas (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- NRT New York LLC v. Johnson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Espinal v. Trezechahn 1065 Avenue of Americas, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Liggett Realtors, Inc. v. Gresham (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Ruggiero v. Cardella Trucking Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Santoni v. Bertelsmann Property, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Phufas v. Cornerstone New York Muni Fund, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Dawn's Gold Realty v. Dagnese (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Donald Yoo (New York) Corp. v. Tauber (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- H. H. Hill Realty Services, Inc. v. Cummings (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- Romeo v. Schmidt (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- Levinson v. Genesse Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Cook/Pony Farm Real Estate, Inc. v. Spartan Enterprises, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
- Brazilian Investment Advisory Services v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 1989)
- Spielvogel v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (107 AD2d 622; see also, Graff v Billet, 64 NY2d 899).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.