New York Court of Appeals, 1985

Goldstein v. Gold

Goldstein v. Gold
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 8, 1985
66 N.Y.2d 624; 495 N.Y.S.2d 32; 485 N.E.2d 239; 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17152
Goldstein v. Gold

Cases that cite this one

36 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice (now Judge) Vito J. Titone at the Appellate Division (106 AD2d 100), only insofar as the opinion holds that the intervening defendant, who purchased the property encumbered by the mortgage, is bound by a notice of pendency filed prior to the recording of his deed and the satisfaction of mortgage.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.