Allstate Insurance v. Giordano
Allstate Insurance v. Giordano
66 N.Y.2d 810; 489 N.E.2d 249; 498 N.Y.S.2d 362; 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 18283
Cases that cite this one
18 later published cases cite this decision.
- Boykin v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (Ala. 1994)
- New York City Transit Authority v. Hill (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- New York City Transit Authority v. Hill (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Progressive Northeastern Insurance v. Rogers (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Arnold Chevrolet LLC v. Tribune Co. (District Court, E.D. New York 2006)
- Jenkins v. State Farm Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Diaz v. Allison Clark (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Continental Insurance v. Right (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Pantina (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- In re Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1996)
- Carbotrade SpA v. Bureau Veritas (District Court, S.D. New York 1995)
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. Morin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Thomas v. N.A. Chase Manhattan Bank (5th Cir. 1993)
- Allstate Insurance v. Torrales (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Joseph (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Taylor (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Avena (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (108 AD2d 910).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Simons.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.