New York Court of Appeals, 1986

525 Park Avenue Associates v. De Hoyas

New York Court of Appeals · Decided December 19, 1986 · Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr., Concur

69 N.Y.2d 692; 504 N.E.2d 388; 512 N.Y.S.2d 21; 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 21307

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Schachter v. Tolassi (In re 105 East Second Street Associates) (United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York 1997)
Handy v. Renzulli (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
Handy v. Renzulli (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
Kips Bay Towers Associates v. Yuceoglu (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of that court (121 AD2d 908). Moreover, we hold that the filing of a Rent Stabilization Code § 54 (D) application does not preserve a landlord’s right to refuse a renewal of a lease on nonprimary residence grounds, pursuant to section 54 (E) where no notice of such intent has been timely given (see, Golub v Frank, 65 NY2d 900; compare, Crow v 83rd St. Assoc., 68 NY2d 796 [Omnibus Housing Act (L 1983, ch 403) did not implicitly repeal the Golub notice requirement of Rent Stabilization Code § 60]).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.