New York Court of Appeals, 1986

In re the Claim of Cohen

New York Court of Appeals · Decided February 6, 1986

67 N.Y.2d 683; 499 N.Y.S.2d 685; 490 N.E.2d 552; 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 17085

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

In re the Claim of Chorekchan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
In re the Claim of Chorekchan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
In re the Claim of Barnhart (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
In re Cobb (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
In re Luff (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
In re the Claim of Neil (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
In re the Claim of Froehlich (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
In re the Claim of Sortina (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
In re the Claim of Bourk (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
In re Wapnick (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (112 AD2d 687). We add only that unlike Matter of 12 Cornelia St. (Ross) (56 NY2d 895), the evidence here indicates the employer was able to exercise control over the activities of its salespersons beyond the requirements of applicable governmental regulation.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.