MATTER OF CONSOL. EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC. v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. State Board of Real Property Services (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1999)
- Colonial Life Insurance Co. of America v. Curiale (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Frontier Insurance v. State (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1993)
- Rokowsky v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Mogulescu v. 255 West 98th Street Owners Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- Ponterio v. Regan (New York Supreme Court 1987)
- Hodes v. Axelrod (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
In the Matter of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Appellant,
v.
State Board of Equalization and Assessment, Respondent, and Village of Pleasantville et al., Intervenors-Respondents. (And 167 Other Related Proceedings.)
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Adlai S. Hardin, Jr., Martin B. Cowan, Mark S. Tulis and John Moss Hinchcliff for appellant.
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Michael S. Buskus, Robert Hermann and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.
Michael Whiteman, Melvin H. Osterman, Jr., and Jonathan P. Nye for Village of Pleasantville and others, intervenors-respondents.
Henry J. Smith and James G. Fine for City of Mount Vernon and others, intervenors-respondents.
Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (John P. MacArthur of counsel), for City of New York, intervenor-respondent.
Marvin S. Fink for Village of Scarsdale, intervenor-respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR.
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Presiding Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the *787 Appellate Division (103 AD2d 453). Question certified answered in the affirmative.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.