Kravitz v. County of Rockland
Kravitz v. County of Rockland
67 N.Y.2d 685; 490 N.E.2d 860; 499 N.Y.S.2d 941; 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 16625
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- Fenton v. County of Dutchess (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Ramirez v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Iacone v. Town of Hempstead (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Gobardhan v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Leiblein v. Clark (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Camilleri v. County of Suffolk (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Kressner v. Town of Malta (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Carbone v. Town of Brookhaven (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Kyser v. New York City Housing Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Reisse v. County of Nassau (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- Gaye v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1988)
- Carroll v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Thom v. Village of Wappingers Falls (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- In re Cali (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Perry v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law in denying plaintiff leave to serve late notices of claim (General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Hancock, Jr.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.