Smith v. Sipe
Smith v. Sipe
67 N.Y.2d 928; 493 N.E.2d 237; 502 N.Y.S.2d 134; 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 18054
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- Baker v. Board of Education (N.Y. 1987)
- Ponticello v. County of Suffolk (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations Board (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Portlette v. Toussaint (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Butler v. Mccarty (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Butler v. McCarty (New York Supreme Court 2002)
- Buffalo Police Benevolent Ass'n v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
- Schmitt v. Hicksville UFSD No. 17 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Ahrens v. New York State Public Employees Federation, AFL-CIO (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Altimari v. Parker (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Braatz v. Mathison (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Shah v. State (N.Y. Ct. Cl. 1988)
- Trainosky v. Civil Service Employees Ass'n (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Herington v. Civil Service Employees Ass'n (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- McClary v. Civil Service Employees Ass'n (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
- Baker v. Board of Education of West Irondequoit Central School District (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order reversed, with costs, and defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint granted for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Presiding Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division (109 AD2d 1034, 1036-1037). Question certified answered in the affirmative.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.