Kasachkoff v. City of New York
Cases that cite this one
19 later published cases cite this decision.
- Pancza v. Remco Baby, Inc. (District Court, D. New Jersey 1991)
- County Vanlines Inc. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2004)
- Gary Shamley v. Itt Corporation, James J. Cox, George L. Klaus, Russell G. Tisman (2d Cir. 1989)
- Olivieri v. McDonald's Corp. (District Court, E.D. New York 1988)
- Pandian v. New York Health & Hospitals Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Watson v. City of Jamestown (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Anderson v. Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- Murganti v. Weber (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
- Caplan v. Winslett (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- McNaughton v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- Farooq v. Coffey (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- Jung Hee Lee Han v. State (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Levine v. Board of Education (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Williams v. Varig Brazilian Airlines (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Brown v. New York City Transit Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Hall v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (N.Y. 1990)
- Richard L. v. Armon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Summers v. County of Monroe (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
- Sullivan v. Board of Education (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Appellate Division that the first and second causes of action for defamation should have been dismissed as against the Health and Hospitals Corporation for plaintiffs failure to serve a proper notice of claim (see, Davidson v Bronx Mun. Hosp., 64 NY2d 59, 62), and as against the individual defendants for failure to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to malice or abuse of defendants’ qualified privilege (see, Loughry v Lincoln First Bank, 67 NY2d 369, 375-376; Dano v Royal Globe Ins. Co., 59 NY2d 827, 829). Likewise, the third cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress was properly dismissed against all defendants inasmuch as plaintiff failed to allege sufficiently extreme and outrageous conduct (see, Freihofer v Hearst Corp., 65 NY2d 135, 143).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr., concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.