New York Court of Appeals, 1986

Scaringe v. Ackerman

Scaringe v. Ackerman
New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 17, 1986
68 N.Y.2d 885; 501 N.E.2d 593; 508 N.Y.S.2d 944; 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20605
Scaringe v. Ackerman

Cases that cite this one

21 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice John T. Casey at the Appellate Division (119 AD2d 327). We add that our decision does not preclude a future challenge to respondent Ackerman’s qualifications in the appropriate forum (see, NY Const, art III, § 9; Matter of Harwood v Meisser, 41 AD2d 531, affd 31 NY2d 1000).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr. Taking no part: Judge Kaye.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.