People v. Khan
People v. Khan
68 N.Y.2d 921; 510 N.Y.S.2d 72; 502 N.E.2d 987; 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20877
People v. Khan
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant’s request for a justification charge, though made after summations and the court’s initial charge, neither of which referred to that defense, was timely (CPL 300.10 [5]). The court’s denial of the request was improper even though the act upon which the defense is based was not intentional (see, People v McManus, 67 NY2d 541; People v Padgett, 60 NY2d 142; People v Huntley, 87 AD2d 488, affd 59 NY2d 868).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Kaye, Alexan
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.