In Re the Arbitration Between Denihan & Denihan

New York Court of Appeals
In Re the Arbitration Between Denihan & Denihan, 69 N.Y.2d 725 (N.Y. 1987)
512 N.Y.S.2d 367; 504 N.E.2d 694; 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 15031

In Re the Arbitration Between Denihan & Denihan

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. Insofar as the Appellate Division dismissed petitioner’s application to stay arbitration, we affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Leonard H. Sandler (119 AD2d 144). To the extent that the Appellate Division granted an injunction pending determination of the issues raised in the arbitration, we conclude that the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Benjamin J. Denihan, Petitioner, Arthur J. Bresciani, Jr., Et Al., Appellants, and Michael G. Denihan, Respondent
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published