Randolph v. City of New York
Randolph v. City of New York
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by reinstating the complaint against defendants Foster and New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation and granting a new trial as against those defendants and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against defendants Foster and New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation and with costs to defendant City of New York against plaintiff.
As submitted to the jury, the pivotal issue in this case was
The action as against defendant City of New York was, however, properly dismissed. It is an entity separate and distinct from the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (Brennan v City of New York, 59 NY2d 791), and plaintiff failed to demonstrate at trial any factual predicate for imposing liability upon the City.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum; Judge Alexander taking no part.
Order modified, etc.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Howard Randolph, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Bessie Randolph v. City of New York
- Cited By
- 13 cases
- Status
- Published