New York Court of Appeals, 1987

People v. Jackson

New York Court of Appeals · Decided October 8, 1987

70 N.Y.2d 768; 520 N.Y.S.2d 746; 514 N.E.2d 1369; 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 18888

Cases that cite this one

19 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Baltes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
People v. Richards (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
People v. Smith (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
People v. Wilkes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
People v. Perez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
People v. Ramirez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
People v. Hayes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
People v. Clark (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
People v. Ciaprazi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1998)
People v. Clark (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
People v. Henry (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
People v. Pinchback (N.Y. 1993)
People v. Gonzalez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
People v. Hayes (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
People v. Lyons (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
People v. Rodriguez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
People v. Simmons (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
People v. Carter (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1989)
In re Nicole V. (N.Y. 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s primary argument in this court is that her conviction must be reversed because she was denied effective assistance of counsel during the trial. After examining the record and viewing the evidence, law and circumstances of the case in totality, we conclude defendant’s allegations of counsel’s ineffectiveness are not supported by the record and she was not denied meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147).

We concur with the Appellate Division’s disposition of defendant’s remaining contentions (see, 121 AD2d 743).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur; Judge Titone taking no part.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.