People v. Bynum
Cases that cite this one
394 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- People v. Brown (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Scission v. Lempke (District Court, W.D. New York 2011)
- Fore v. Ercole (District Court, E.D. New York 2009)
- Gardner v. Fisher (District Court, E.D. New York 2008)
- Brito v. Phillips (District Court, S.D. New York 2007)
- Carr v. Fischer (District Court, E.D. New York 2003)
- People v. Washington (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2000)
- People v. Norman (N.Y. 1995)
- People v. Nieves (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Sanchez (County Court of New York, Putnam County 2024)
- People v. Sanchez (County Court of New York, Putnam County 2024)
- People v. Altman (Randolph) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York 2021)
- People v. Kimbrough (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- People v. Terranova (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- People v. Vasquez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- People v. Finch (N.Y. 2014)
- Baker v. Kirkpatrick (District Court, W.D. New York 2011)
- People v. Nesbitt (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- People v. Burdick (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- People v. Miller (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- People v. Taberas (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- People v. Squires (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- People v. Brisson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- People v. Hawkins (N.Y. 2008)
- People v. Gonzalez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant was convicted of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [2] [b]). The only issue defendant urges on this appeal — that the People failed to establish that the object he displayed to the victim appeared to be a lethal weapon— was not asserted at trial, and therefore has not been preserved for our review.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.