People v. Logan
Cases that cite this one
38 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- People v. Hunt (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1996)
- People v. Quinones (New York Supreme Court 1994)
- People v. Nesbitt (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- People v. Perkins (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- People v. Ross (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1997)
- People v. Gutierrez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Spencer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Nkemakolam (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Jones (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Saraguard (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Edwards (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Smith (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Bailey (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Caldwell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Monroe (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. McDougal (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1995)
- People v. Peterson (New York Supreme Court 1995)
- People v. Okehoffurum (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Suarez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Mcgee (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Douglas (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Grandison (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Smalls (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Cohen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1994)
- People v. Perez (New York Supreme Court 1994)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant, a former New York City detective, was convicted after a jury trial of bribe receiving and official misconduct. Defendant had introduced a known drug dealer to a fellow police officer and was present when the drug dealer gave the officer a bribe in return for his cooperation in ensuring that the dealer’s drug operations would be protected from police investigation.
At this stage of review of a criminal conviction, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution. Under that standard, the People’s proof as to each count (insofar as objections have been preserved by defendant) was sufficient. Defendant’s current claim that the People failed to establish a central element of the crime of official misconduct (Penal Law § 195.00) — the duty element — is unpreserved. Defendant argued before the trial court only that there was no evidence that he had received a benefit. This contention was inadequate to alert the trial court that defendant was urging insufficiency based on the entirely distinct claim — that he had no clearly inherent duty but only a *861 discretionary responsibility to arrest the drug dealer during the criminal transaction (see, People v Gomez, 67 NY2d 843).
Defendant’s remaining arguments are either without merit or unpreserved.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.