MATTER OF HOLTZMAN v. Marrus

New York Court of Appeals
MATTER OF HOLTZMAN v. Marrus, 74 N.Y.2d 865 (N.Y. 1989)
547 N.Y.S.2d 829; 547 N.E.2d 84; 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 2998
Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa Concur

MATTER OF HOLTZMAN v. Marrus

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the petition dismissed.

The court had jurisdiction to try the case and the only question is whether it had the power to issue the preclusion order. Even if prohibition were available to challenge such an order the proceeding would have to be commenced within four months of the date on which the order became final and binding (CPLR 217). Because the order in this case went into effect immediately, the petition served on Justice Marrus more than four months after that date was untimely (see, Siegel, NY Prac § 566, at 793).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

*867 Judgment reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed in a memorandum.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of Elizabeth Holtzman, Respondent, v. Alan Marrus, as a Justice of the Supreme Court, Et Al., Appellants
Cited By
256 cases
Status
Published