MATTER OF KRAUSKOPF v. Perales
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- COUNTY OF NIAGARA v. SHAH, M.D., M.P.H., NIRAV R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- COUNTY OF NIAGARA v. SHAH, M.D., M.P.H., NIRAV R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- County of Niagara v. Shah (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- County of Niagara v. Shah (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- COUNTY OF NIAGARA v. DAINES, RICHARD F. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- County of Niagara v. Daines (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- County of St. Lawrence v. Shah (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- County of St. Lawrence v. Shah (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Spano v. Novello (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- MTR SCHWARTFIGURE v. Hartnett (N.Y. 1994)
- Schwartfigure v. Hartnett (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1993)
- Straus v. 345 East 73 Owners Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1992)
- Flowers v. Perales (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1991)
- Robinson v. Perales (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1990)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. .
We agree, for the reasons stated by Justice Ann T. Mikoll at the Appellate Division (139 AD2d 147), that the Department of Social Services did not violate procedural requirements in adopting a definition of "mental disability” for the purpose of reimbursement eligibility pursuant to Social Services Law § 368-a; and that the definition adopted by the Department of Social Services is neither irrational nor arbitrary.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.